Let's start
with you.
You're one of a few experts we trust to pressure-test the Decoder. Just two quick details, then a handful of questions you'll answer by speaking — no typing.
Tell us what to fix.
Tap Dictate and just talk — your words appear live, then we clean them up automatically. No typing needed.
You've had a look around — what stood out, and how did it feel to use?
The plain-language breakdown of each ingredient — what it does, the dose, the evidence. Clear, or confusing anywhere?
Think about the way each ingredient's details are laid out — what you see first, how it's grouped, how much is on screen at once. Easy to scan and digest, or overwhelming and hard to follow? What would you reorganise?
Navigation and layout — could you find things without thinking? Anything that felt cluttered or in the way?
Anything your patients, clients, or users would look up or request that we don't cover yet?
Beyond what-it-does, dose, and evidence — what's missing? e.g. India context (ICMR/FSSAI), interactions with meds or other supplements, contraindications, timing.
Every claim links to a ranked source. Does this lineup feel right? Move, add, or drop anything?
Tier S — Gold standard
- Cochrane, PubMed RCTs & meta-analyses, NIH ODS, WGO (probiotics)
- Indian primary (preferred): ICMR-NIN, FSSAI
- Regulators: EFSA (EU food safety) · FDA (US, GRAS & actions) · EMA (EU medicines) · TGA (Australia) · WHO (position statements, VMNIS)
- Specialists: ISSN (sports nutrition) · IARC (carcinogenicity) · WADA (anti-doping) · JECFA (food additives)
Tier A
- IJMR · population surveys · USP-NF & Indian Pharmacopoeia
Tier B — cross-checks
- Indian herbal journals · Examine.com (cross-check only)
Would you point other people to it — friends, peers, fellow experts? Why or why not?
Be honest — does it feel credible? What would make you trust it more?
If you could change just one thing, what would it be?
Send it over
Your feedback is saved to the team automatically. You can also copy, email, or download it.